1200KM / telemetry
Cloud Storage Access — Detection Telemetry
Access to stored cloud data, including reads and provider-supported access outcomes.
Collection and providers
Explicitly select relevant object-read data events; keep principal, key, request ID and result without object contents.
- AWS CloudTrail for S3: Bucket control-plane events and explicitly selected object data events.
- Google Cloud Audit Logs: Cloud Storage access requires the relevant audit category and permissions.
- Azure storage resource logs: Use resource-specific data-plane diagnostics; Activity Log alone does not describe blob reads.
Configuration
- Choose only the lab buckets/containers and prefixes. Enable read/write data-event collection when object access is needed; management events alone are insufficient.
- Keep administrative changes separately from object reads/writes. Set a cost budget and retention limit before enabling high-volume data logging.
- Preserve object version/key, requesting identity, action, source address, result and request ID. Verify the collector actually receives one benign read and one benign write.
[
{
"Name": "LabObjectReads",
"FieldSelectors": [
{
"Field": "eventCategory",
"Equals": [
"Data"
]
},
{
"Field": "resources.type",
"Equals": [
"AWS::S3::Object"
]
},
{
"Field": "resources.ARN",
"StartsWith": [
"arn:aws:s3:::lab-bucket/demo/"
]
},
{
"Field": "readOnly",
"Equals": [
"true"
]
}
]
}
]Replace the placeholder with an owned lab bucket/prefix. Review costs and merge with required selectors; applying selectors can replace an existing selection. This does not enable management-event retention or object-write coverage.
Synthetic event example
Project-normalized synthetic JSON, not a native provider log, captured event, attack verdict or validated detection. A parser/adapter is required for a real SIEM. Example names, IPs and values are fictional.
{
"schema": "1200km.telemetry.example.v1",
"synthetic": true,
"timestamp": "2026-09-27T12:00:00Z",
"telemetry_id": "DC0025",
"collector": "illustrative-lab-collector",
"observation": {
"action": "get_object",
"bucket": "lab-bucket",
"key": "demo.txt",
"actor": "lab-reader",
"result": "success"
}
}Visibility and validation
Storage metadata, listing, object access and bucket administration are different operations. Do not equate a successful request with proven exfiltration or complete content visibility.
- Record the lab scope, collector version, effective configuration and expected source fields before testing.
- Use an approved benign action or read-only snapshot appropriate to this type. For destructive, privileged or physical effects, use a reviewed fixture or existing authorized evidence instead of causing the effect.
- Verify the native source record locally and at the collector; compare timestamps, identity, object, action/result and the type-specific fields listed below. Save a redacted real capture separately from the synthetic example.
- Check a normal baseline and collector-loss case. Fixture parsing proves parser behavior only; it does not prove sensor coverage or malicious-behavior detection.
Primary sources
Connected ecosystem references
Linked tags
Related simulations and detection workspaces
Each workspace retains its own logsource and platform requirements. A technique-level association is not a per-rule sensor mapping.
- T1048 · Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1074 · Data Staged · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1074.002 · Remote Data Staging · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1213 · Data from Information Repositories · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1213.006 · Databases · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1491 · Defacement · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1491.002 · External Defacement · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1528 · Steal Application Access Token · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1530 · Data from Cloud Storage · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1619 · Cloud Storage Object Discovery · Detection rules & anomalies
- T1677 · Poisoned Pipeline Execution · Detection rules & anomalies
Attack tools through shared TTPs
These are two-hop navigation links through explicitly associated techniques, not independent tool-to-sensor assertions.
Connected anomaly research
Curated research views reached through an exact source technique, a catalog model, or a reviewed collection reference. These are navigation associations, not claims of detector effectiveness or sensor equivalence.
Telemetry contracts · Maintained query examples · Validation and blind spots
Pinned research references. No browser attack runner, live simulation result or validated detector is asserted. Source mappings and validation limits are preserved. ATT&CK / Atomic provenance · Detection provenance.