1200KM / telemetry
Pod Creation — Detection Telemetry
A request to create a Kubernetes Pod and its recorded API outcome.
Collection and providers
Include create on pods in the audit policy; retain namespace, requesting user and response code, and join runtime evidence for actual startup.
- Kubernetes API audit: Who requested a resource action and how the API server handled it.
- Managed Kubernetes audit exports: Provider-managed equivalent when control-plane flags are not customer-configurable.
Configuration
- Configure a lab audit policy and log/webhook backend, or the managed service audit export. Start with Metadata for the required verbs/resources and namespace.
- Add narrowly scoped Request or RequestResponse only when bodies are required; secrets and tokens can leak into audit data.
- Keep auditID, stage, user, verb, objectRef, sourceIPs and responseStatus. Correlate API requests with scheduler, kubelet or runtime state before asserting execution.
apiVersion: audit.k8s.io/v1
kind: Policy
rules:
- level: Metadata
namespaces: ["lab"]
verbs: ["create"]
resources:
- group: ""
resources: ["pods"]
- level: NoneThis intentionally narrow teaching policy is not a production audit baseline. A self-managed API server also needs an audit policy file and log/webhook backend; managed services expose provider-specific controls. Do not replace an existing broader policy with this example.
Synthetic event example
Project-normalized synthetic JSON, not a native provider log, captured event, attack verdict or validated detection. A parser/adapter is required for a real SIEM. Example names, IPs and values are fictional.
{
"schema": "1200km.telemetry.example.v1",
"synthetic": true,
"timestamp": "2026-09-27T12:00:00Z",
"telemetry_id": "DC0019",
"collector": "illustrative-lab-collector",
"observation": {
"verb": "create",
"resource": "pods",
"namespace": "lab",
"name": "demo-pod",
"response_code": 201
}
}Visibility and validation
An API create request does not prove a container ran. Audit stage and response code matter. Pod logs and API audit logs serve different purposes.
- Record the lab scope, collector version, effective configuration and expected source fields before testing.
- Use an approved benign action or read-only snapshot appropriate to this type. For destructive, privileged or physical effects, use a reviewed fixture or existing authorized evidence instead of causing the effect.
- Verify the native source record locally and at the collector; compare timestamps, identity, object, action/result and the type-specific fields listed below. Save a redacted real capture separately from the synthetic example.
- Check a normal baseline and collector-loss case. Fixture parsing proves parser behavior only; it does not prove sensor coverage or malicious-behavior detection.
Primary sources
Connected ecosystem references
Linked tags
Related simulations and detection workspaces
Each workspace retains its own logsource and platform requirements. A technique-level association is not a per-rule sensor mapping.
Attack tools through shared TTPs
These are two-hop navigation links through explicitly associated techniques, not independent tool-to-sensor assertions.
No reviewed association in this snapshot.
Pinned research references. No browser attack runner, live simulation result or validated detector is asserted. Source mappings and validation limits are preserved. ATT&CK / Atomic provenance · Detection provenance.