MITRE ATLAS 2026.09 / technique reference
AML.T0117
Autonomous Attack-Path Adaptation
MITRE source definition
Adversaries may use an AI agent to autonomously construct and repeatedly revise an attack path toward an adversary-defined objective. Given a high-level objective, the system may derive intermediate objectives, identify prerequisites, and compare candidate paths, and incorporate observations from previous actions to adaptively sequence techniques without a human directing each step.
Autonomous AI agents may also exhibit this behavior while pursuing an objective provided for a legitimate, benign, or authorized purpose when the intermediate objectives or methods selected by the system cross an authorization, trust, control, or safety boundary and result in attempted or realized harmful cyber activity.
Through repeated observation-decision-action cycles, the system may interpret command output, errors, defensive responses, changes in access, and newly discovered information. It may use those observations to reprioritize actions, replace an intermediate objective, abandon an unproductive branch, discard findings invalidated by additional evidence, or pursue an alternative path.
An autonomous AI system may generate enabling objectives whose primary purpose is to increase its future operational capability rather than directly accomplishing the assigned objective. These objectives may include acquiring new exploits (See [Autonomous Exploit Development](/techniques/AML.T0017.001)), additional authorities, identities, execution environments, communication paths, tools, or trust relationships that expand the set of actions available to subsequent planning cycles. Newly acquired capabilities may themselves become prerequisites for additional enabling objectives, resulting in progressive expansion of the agent's operational reach over the course of an operation.
Attack-path replanning may occur within one agent run or emerge across multiple independent agents. Agents may communicate persistent, shared artifacts (See [Autonomous AI Agent Communication: Communication via Shared Artifacts](/techniques/AML.T0118.000)), allowing discoveries, requests, capabilities, constraints, task state, and results produced by one agent to affect the subsequent path selected by another. Participating agents may adopt peer requests, divide work voluntarily, reuse successful methods, continue incomplete activity, or redirect their local paths without a centralized planner, shared context window, or complete view of the broader operation.
Human involvement does not preclude autonomous attack-path replanning. A human operator, user, evaluator, or workflow may select the target, define the objective, establish constraints, provide capabilities, or approve consequential transitions.
[Autonomous Attack-Path Adaptation](/techniques/AML.T0117) and [Autonomous Attack Orchestration](/techniques/AML.T0124) may occur together but describe different control functions. Attack-path adaptation captures how evidence changes the selected path. Attack orchestration captures how work is allocated, coordinated, validated, and redirected across agents.
Source modified 2026-08-31. Reproduced from the pinned ATLAS release; inline technique links resolve to local reference pages.
Parent, sub-techniques and ATT&CK references
No explicit relationship in this pinned source.
Source-backed defensive context
MITRE mitigations
MITRE case studies
- AML.CS0068 Autonomous OpenAI Evaluation Agents Compromise Hugging Face Infrastructure · Incident
- AML.CS0069 GTG-1002 Claude Code Espionage Campaign · Incident
- AML.CS0070 Threat Actor Uses a DeepSeek-Powered Hermes Agent in Langflow and n8n Exploitation Attempts · Incident
- AML.CS0071 Multi-Agent Framework Compromises Taiwanese Government Systems · Incident
These are explicit source relationships, not independently reproduced incidents or validated detection coverage.
Simulation and telemetry boundary
This is a technique reference page, not a runnable simulation. No ATLAS-specific telemetry mapping, local attack execution or detector validation is asserted. MITRE maturity describes its source evidence, not a 1200km lab result.
For broader context—not technique-specific control mappings—see AI Security, AI Security Course, and detection-validation methodology.
Provenance and attribution
Immutable MITRE ATLAS source · Import provenance · Attribution and transformation notice · Apache License 2.0
Copyright 2021-2026 MITRE. Source text and explicit relationships are retained; navigation, formatting and local links are provided by 1200km.
No explicit relationship in this pinned source.